JONATHAN POLLARD MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE, BUT
HE IS HARDLY THE VICTIM HIS SUPPORTERS PORTRAY
Allan C. Brownfeld
News
News 2015
Jonathan Pollard, the U.S. intelligence analyst who spied for Israel and was
sentenced to life in prison, could be released as early as November when he
becomes eligible for mandatory parole, according to the Justice Department.
The Justice Department said that although Pollard was ordered to serve life
in prison after being convicted of selling U.S. secrets to the Israeli
government, the terms of his sentence require that he be released after 30
years, a date which will arrive this fall, unless the government can prove
that he violated rules in prison or is likely to commit additional crimes.
Pollard is in poor health and there is a compelling case for his release on
humanitarian grounds. But we must make clear that his long time supporters
and advocates have been wrong in claiming that he was in any sense treated
unfairly. Consider the long campaign on behalf of Pollard, who pled guilty
to spying on behalf of Israel.
The campaign for Pollard seems incomprehensible. Going back to 1989, for
example, the Central Conference of American Rabbis called upon the entire
Reform Jewish movement to express support for Pollard. In a resolution
passed unanimously by the executive board of the CCAR, a worldwide
organization of Reform rabbis, the organization proposed that major Jewish
and Christian organizations "encourage the U.S. Government to re-evaluate
the Pollard case..." Rabbi Mark Golub, a spokesman for the CCAR declared,
"All the images about Pollard by the press turned out to be a terrible
slander."
On April 25, 1989, a group of 15 rabbis and others participated in a
Passover "freedom Seder" in front of the maximum security federal prison in
Marion, Illinois in support of Pollard. The Seder, led by Rabbi Avi Weiss of
the Hebrew Institute of Riverdale, New York, began with a brief ceremony on
the front steps of the historic Old Courthouse in St. Louis, where the
landmark Dred Scott case was argued in 1846. Rabbi Weiss referred to Pollard
as a "Jewish political prisoner."
Shortly after the convictions of Pollard and his wife, a Justice for the
Pollards Committee was organized. It portrayed Pollard as a victim of a
vindictive and anti-Semitic Justice Department. "We have before us a new
Dreyfus affair," said a newsletter put out by the committee. Discussing this
outrageous analogy, Robert Friedman, writing in the Village Voice, noted
that, "Unlike Dreyfus, who was framed by the French army, Pollard is an
avowed spy."
Ever since Pollard's incarceration, there has been a concerted campaign for
his release by his American supporters and by the Israeli government. To
understand the real issues involved in this case, it is instructive to
review the actual evidence.
In May 1987, Pollard, an intelligence analyst for the U.S. Navy, was found
guilty of espionage, having sold some 360 cubic feet of classified documents
to Israel. So damaging to U.S. security was Pollard's role as a spy that
Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger told Israeli ambassador Meir Rosenne
that Pollard should have been executed. Joseph di Genova, the prosecutor who
handled the Pollard case, says that the damage he did to American security
is "beyond calculation."
Di Genova noted that "the severity of the sentence is the best evidence of
the gravity of the damage done to the national security by Mr. Pollard's
operation." Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles E. Leeper declared: "The
defendant has admitted that he sold to Israel a volume of classified
documents 10 feet by 6 feet by 6 feet." He said that Pollard provided Israel
with thousands of pages, including secret information on the location of
American ships and training exercises.
In an affidavit, Secretary Weinberger said, "It is difficult for me...to
conceive of a greater harm to national security than that caused by the
defendant in view of the breadth, the critical importance to the U.S. and
the high sensitivity of the information he sold to Israel."
Pollard reported that one of his Israeli ""handlers" sought details of the
National Security Agency's electronic eavesdropping in Israel as well as
names of Israelis spying for the U.S. Pollard said that Israel's 1985 raid
on the Tunisia headquarters of the PLO was aided by materials he passed
along.
The U.S. Government said that the damage resulting from Pollard's spying
exceeded that caused by Ronald W. Pelton, a former NSA employee, who was
convicted in 1986 of selling classified electronic surveillance secrets to
the Soviet Union. Prosecutors said that, "Pelton compromised specific
intelligence-gathering methods in a specific area, and damaged the U.S.
position relative to the Soviet Union...Pollard compromised a breadth and
volume of classified information as great as in any reported espionage case
and adversely affected U.S. interests vis a vis numerous countries,
including, potentially, the Soviet Union."
They also disclosed that Pollard, who was paid more than $50,000 by the
Israelis expected to earn "ten times that amount" for continued spying. But
he was arrested on Nov. 21, 1985, on his way to the Israeli Embassy in
Washington, D.C. to request asylum.
Those who argue that Pollard's sentence was excessive have not made a
persuasive case, and their motives for suggesting that Pollard is, somehow,
a "political prisoner," or a victim of "anti-Semitism" is unclear, since
such charges are without any basis in fact. Ronald Pelton, for example, was
sentenced to three life terms plus 10 years for selling secrets to the
Soviet Union about electronic eavesdropping that he learned in 14 years as a
NSA technician. A memorandum prepared by two U.S. Government prosecutors,
Charles Leeper and David Geneson, said: "Pelton disclosed no classified
documents to the Soviet Union. Rather, following his retirement he met with
Soviet agents on approximately nine occasions over a five-year period during
which he orally relayed classified information he could recall."
Some U.S. intelligence analysts believe that documents stolen by Pollard
were handed over to Moscow by Soviet moles within the Israeli intelligence
service. Neil Livingstone of Georgetown University argued that, "There's no
question that Mossad's penetrated. A lot of what Pollard stole wasn't
related to Israeli security. Israel is a great trader in intelligence. To
get an advantage someplace, they get something someone else wants and they
create an indebtedness."
Many in the U.S. intelligence community feel strongly that Pollard should
not be released prematurely. In 1998, George Tenet, then director of the
CIA, apparently suppressed a deal with Israel on Pollard by threatening to
resign if the spy went free. In an article in the Washington Post in 1998,
former directors of naval intelligence William Studeman, Sumner Shapiro,
John L. Butts and Thomas Brooks argued that as Pollard's case never went
trial, because of his plea deal, it never became public that Pollard
"offered classified information to three other countries before working for
the Israelis and that he offered his services to a fourth country while he
was spying for Israel." The article also said that the "sheer volume" of
documents passed on by Pollard was almost unrivaled.
Israel has been campaigning for Pollard's release for many years, as have
many of its most vocal American supporters. This campaign has not been
simply for his release on humanitarian grounds, but persists in falsely
charging that this admitted spy is either a "political prisoner" or the
victim of religious prejudice, charges with no foundation whatever. While
some Jewish organizations have embraced Pollard, for reasons they have yet
to properly explain, most American Jews have recoiled from his actions.
Former Israeli ambassador Michael Oren, in his book "Ally: My Journey Across
the American-Israel Divide," recalls that, " 0ne senior member of the NSC
told me over breakfast, "As an American Jew, I believe Jonathan Pollard
should get out of prison..." He paused and said, "In a coffin."
Pollard was disavowed by the Israelis upon his 1985 arrest, but later
embraced and was granted citizenship in 1995 and, by 2013 had become the
focal point of a protest movement. An online petition demanding clemency
drew 175,000 signatures. If Pollard is released in November, it might be a
serious mistake to permit him to go to Israel, where he seems to be
something of a hero for spying on the U.S. It might be best to require him
to remain in the U.S. under supervision. What legal standing does Israel's
granting citizenship to an American it paid to spy on his own country really
have?
Jonathan Pollard is not a victim of political persecution or of anti-
Semitism but of the Zionist philosophy he learned as a boy, which told him
that Israel was his real "homeland" and that he was in "exile" in America.
Most young Americans who hear this refrain recognize how little it has to do
with truth or with the reality of their lives. Jonathan Pollard evidently
believed it all and acted on it. He has paid a heavy price, but not an
unreasonable one. He may merit release after all of this time, but it should
be made certain that he can do us no further harm. And the motives of those
who have so eagerly embraced him are certainly a legitimate subject for
future examination.
This article may also be found at:
http://jewishcurrents.org/jonathan-pollard-hes-no-victim-38423
|