Doubt Over Future And Internal Divisions Temper Israel’s 50th Anniversary Celebration
Allan Brownfeld, Editor
Special Interest Report
May-June 1998
Israel’s Jubilee Anniversary "is prompting a heavy dose of introspection, and there is little sense that Israelis are happy about what they see," writes Washington Post correspondent Doug Struck (April 30, 1998). "The reflection is of a country mired in a tense deadlock with Arabs, beset by internal squabbling, soured on its institutions and coping with a slowing economy."
Writing in the Israeli newspaper Maariv, commentator Hemi Shaley, declared: "There is much more division in the air, a lot less feeling of togetherness. We are much less tolerant and hate much more." Writing in Haaretz, Israel’s preeminent novelist Amos Oz, notes that, "Israel as conceived by the founding fathers and mothers was a naive wish. What resulted? A society of arguments. Sit in a cafe or get on a bus and you seem to hear more arguments than there are people. Everyone is shouting at the same time, The new state was to be the most biblical, the most socialist, the most aesthetic. Obviously it was impossible to fulfill all these dreams. A few actually materialized. But even those that became flesh ultimately assumed the frayed, disenchanting shape of any dream that is fulfilled."
Uri Avnery, 75, a long time liberal critic of Israeli government policy, said: "Those of us who were here when Israel was created and took part in it find this is not the state we were hoping for. As we say in Hebrew, it’s not the child we have prayed for."
Writing from Israel in USA Today (April 29, 1998), Carol Morello describes the strife between ultra—Orthodox and secular Israelis: "Many Israelis believe this domestic conflict will dominate the nation’s second 50 years the way the Arab-Israeli conflict defined the first...This is not the way Israel’s pioneers envisioned the Jewish state would be. David Ben-Gurion...imagined that within two or three generations, Jews from the Diaspora would meld into a homogeneous culture with shared values. His vision of a ‘new Jew’ was a Western-style democrat who was tolerant of religion but committed to a secular, socialist state. It didn’t quite turn out that way. While possessing a democracy that has no rival in the Middle East, Israelis have all but abandoned socialism for capitalism, which has lifted their standard of living to the level of Britain’s. And rather than blending into seamless whole, Israel has grown strikingly heterogeneous. Though the state still defines itself as a Jewish state, a large minority is not Jewish, including Arab Israelis and non—Jewish spouses and children of immigrants. They cannot wed in the country because marriage and death rites are controlled by Orthodox rabbis and their strict rules of lineage and religious conversion."
In a poll taken by the Tarni Steinmetz Center for Peace Studies at Tel Aviv University, 79% of Israelis polled said they expect violence to erupt between secular and Orthodox Jews, compared with 61% who anticipate more violence between Arabs and Jews. And 69% said the domestic conflict is Israel’s greatest threat, only 30% cite the Palestinians.
Avner Shaki, a leader of the National Religious Party, states; "Before being a democratic Jewish state, we have to ensure it is a Jewish state." He favors limiting immigration by banning spouses and children who are not Jewish. At the same time, former Prime Minister Shimon Peres says that Israel’s very survival depends on curbing the power of religious parties.
"This unholy alliance between religion and state has to be addressed or we are doomed," says Uri Regev, a Reform rabbi who has been fighting to have conversions by Conservative and Reform rabbis recognized in Israel. "After dedicating 50 years to building its infrastructure, military battles and the mass absorption of immigrants, Israel is going to find the next 50 years marked by this struggle."
|